In this paper, we analyzed the model results carefully and found that they estimate lower emissions for ethanol because they estimate that from 20-50\% of the calories in food are not replaced. Physically, the emissions result from reduced respiration of carbon dioxide (and wastes) by people and livestock.~The models attribute these "savings" to the biofuels. ~And if these estimates were wrong, the models would estimate higher greenhouse gas emissions. ~The paper therefore highlights that much of the debate between models is which adverse effects predominate not whether these ethanols generate adverse effects.
Those without subscriptions to the journal can gain free access to the paper through these links.
Summary:~http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/347/6229/1420?ijkey=3HDvP4VYvLiK2\&keytype=ref\&siteid=sci
Reprint:~http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/347/6229/1420?ijkey=3HDvP4VYvLiK2\&keytype=ref\&siteid=sci
Full Text:~http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/347/6229/1420?ijkey=3HDvP4VYvLiK2\&keytype=ref\&siteid=sci